Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08468
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Xiaoling He et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2021cv01758
Plaintiff: Xiaoling He, Yang Yang, Jihe Yang and others
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' California Service Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv07534
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07379
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Global Master Intl Group, Inc., et al v. Esmond Natural, Inc., et al
as 21-55809
Plaintiff / Appellant: GLOBAL MASTER INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and GLOBAL MASTER CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee: ESMOND NATURAL, INC. and PAUL CHIA-YIN WEI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clark v. Gulick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00864
Defendant: Dr. Garth Gulick, John Doe, Dr. Beamer and others
Plaintiff: Adam C. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04380
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03748
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?