Cases 41 - 50 of 745
Lam v. Bankman-Fried
as 3:2022cv07336
Plaintiff:
Elliott Lam
Defendant:
Sam Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison and Golden State Warriors, LLC
Petitioner:
Michael Elliott Jessup, Stephen T Pierce and Julie Chon Papadakis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 2:2022at01131
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinayagam v. Pierce et al
as 3:2022cv05281
Plaintiff:
Nithya Vinayagam
Defendant:
Andrew Pierce, Pierce Shearer LLP, Scott M. Berman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Minzer v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05136
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, Glenn F. Pierce and others
Pepe v. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04895
Plaintiff:
Roberto Pepe
Defendant:
Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc., Ted W. Love, Scott Morrison and others
(PC) Powell v. Lynch
as 2:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Pierce and Lively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Pierce Henderson v. Alex Villanueva
as 2:2022cv06013
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Pierce Henderson
Respondent:
Alex Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
