Cases 41 - 50 of 1,291
Tresor Maleka Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 2:2023cv08882
Petitioner:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Respondent:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Three Unidentified White Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Coronado v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv08571
Plaintiff:
Ever Antonio Alvarado Coronado
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas and Nicanor Guridi Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jose Antonio Vilano Alvarado v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv08052
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Vilano Alvarado
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mary Alvarado v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv07545
Plaintiff:
Mary Alvarado
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez Duran, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2074
Petitioner:
ELVIN ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ DURAN, SOFIA LISETH ALVARADO and DYLAN ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re Naturalization Ceremony 8/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80216
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Eugene Atienza Acosta, Roksana Akhter and others
Alvarado v. Hendrix, et al.
as 23-1936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ALVARADO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DEWAYNE HENDRIX, FCI Sheridan and FCI SHERIDAN
Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Defendant:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alvarado Botello v. Garland
as 23-1820
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE ALVARADO BOTELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
