Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Thomas v. City of Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Lenon D Thomas
Defendant:
City of Phoenix Police Department, Joshua M Roper and Brian C Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. J Choo USA, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02315
Defendant:
J Choo USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Shift4 Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kerri C Wood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carmelo Raul Haynes v. G. Biaggini et al
as 2:2016cv01949
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Warden G. Biaggini, Does, M. Fordham and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Raul Haynes
Conerly v. Beard et al
as 1:2015cv01262
Plaintiff:
Douglas Conerly
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, City of Delano, L. Venables and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.V. Coleman v. J. Soto et al
as 2:2015cv05942
Defendant:
Biageenie, Biageenie, M.A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Mr R.V. Coleman
Charles Samuel Miller v. D Schumacher et al
as 2:2015cv01333
Defendant:
M A Buechter, M A Buechter, A Lugo and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Samuel Miller
Prince Deon Shotwell v. J. Soto et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Defendant:
T. Barnes, G Biaggini, Cowl and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Deon Shotwell, Jr
Shotwell v. Soto et al
as 1:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Prince Deon Shotwell, Jr
Defendant:
J. Soto, G. Biaggini, O. Eguavoen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Rackley et al
as 2:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
William D. Farley
Defendant:
Ron Rackley, Gil, G Olivas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friends of Tahoe Forest Access, et al v. USDA, et al
as 14-15336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRIENDS OF TAHOE FOREST ACCESS, WEBILT FOUR WHEEL DRIVE CLUB, FRIENDS OF GREENHORN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, MOTHER LODE CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB, FOREST ISSUES GROUP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
