Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Loretta Curley et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01876
Plaintiff:
Janet Anglin, Ruby Barnes, Ira Bennett and others
Defendant:
John Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Howard v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv01368
Defendant:
Acala, Carlman, Christianson and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Foster et al
as 2:2013cv00695
Defendant:
Acala, Carlman, Christianson and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald C. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Diana Dicus et al
as 2:2011cv04894
Defendant:
Diana Dicus and Robert Velasquez
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Diana Dicus et al
as 2:2011cv04895
Defendant:
Diana Dicus and Robert Velasquez
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Jerryal Culler v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 08-15878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRYAL J. CULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOLEDAD MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, J CHUDY, Dr. and others
Culler v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv01694
Plaintiff:
Jerryal J. Culler, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Soledad State Prison, J. Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Culler v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01849
Plaintiff:
Jerryal J. Culler, Sr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Soledad Medical Department, J. Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
