Cases 41 - 50 of 52
USA v. Clarence Williams, Jr.
as 10-50060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLARENCE EDWARD WILLIAMS, Jr.
Gary Williams v. D. Dexter
as 09-56622
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
D. DEXTER, Warden
Sara Plowden v. Edward Williams, et al
as 09-56390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA PLOWDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD WILLIAMS, #16458, individually and as a peace officer, Erroneously Sued As Eric Williams and RYAN GALASSI, Officer, #17379
Edward Williams v. Biotab Nutraceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04977
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams, Edward Williams, Edward Williams and others
Defendant:
Biotab Nutraceuticals, Inc., Biotab Nutraceuticals, Inc., Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Edward Cutter, II, et al v. David Seror
as 09-60014
Debtor:
In re: EDWARD WILLIAMS CUTTER, II
Appellant:
EDWARD WILLIAMS CUTTER, II
Appellee:
DAVID SEROR
Williams v. Hedgpeth
as 2:2009cv00721
Petitioner:
James Edward Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
A. Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01274
Petitioner:
Ellis Edward Williams
Respondent:
D.K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edward-Williams v. Evans et al
as 2:2007cv01101
Petitioner:
James Edward-Williams
Respondent:
Mike Evans and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cintas Corporation v. Aybar et al
as 3:2006cv05092
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Jeffrey Aybar , Mark Beckham , Larry Daniel Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Miranda v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2003cv05895
Defendant:
Thomas Webb, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Marvin E. Speed, II and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
