Cases 41 - 50 of 183
Luis Santana, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 12-16782
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
LUIS MARIO SANTANA
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Stefan Rest, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 12-16788
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
STEFAN REST
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Rockwell Automation Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Automation Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15181
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.
Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
Viewsonic Corporation
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02495
Plaintiff:
Jaco Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv00664
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-80051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
