Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Jimmy V. Dang v. Fulkerson et al
as 2:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dang
Defendant:
Does and Fulkerson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Niveen Ismail v. County of Orange, et al
as 14-56486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIVEEN ISMAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA TAYLOR, in her official and individual capacities, JULIE FULKERSON, in her official and individual capacities and HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE
Fulkerson et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2014cv01391
Plaintiff:
Dan Fulkerson and Donna Fulkerson
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antonio Acfalle et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Acfalle, Ernesto Alanis, Jr, Eric Aldrich and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
Fields vs. McKesson Corporation
as 4:2013cv03050
Plaintiff:
James Fields , Robert Ford , Richard Fulkerson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Niveen Ismail v. County of Orange, et al
as 12-56670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIVEEN ISMAIL
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY, LAURA TAYLOR, in her official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL FORD and SHELBY FORD
Fulkerson v. Bank of the West
as 3:2012cv00428
Plaintiff:
John Fulkerson
Defendant:
Bank of the West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Brian Fulkerson v. Stater Bros Market Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01407
Defendant:
Does, Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1877 and Stater Bros Market Inc
Plaintiff:
Brian Fulkerson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
