Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Howell v. Babb, et al.
as 1:2018cv00467
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
S. Babb, S. Tumacder, J. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Burns, et al.
as 1:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
J. Burns, D. Lopez, J. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03748
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Ward , James Abbott , Victor Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Rodriguez v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Michael J. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Walter J. Burns v. Edward Valenzuela
as 2:2014cv07177
Petitioner:
Walter J. Burns
Respondent:
Edward Valenzuela
Kevin Campbell et al v. Evelyn Cathcart et al
as 2:2014cv04412
Defendant:
Bancroft Ventures Ltd, Bancroft Ventures UK Ltd, Brian Bodell and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Campbell and Grayson Consulting Inc
Unknown:
Andrea K St. Amand, Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr, Merritt G Abney and others
Burns et al v. Records Custodian for Missoula County Detention Facility et al
as 9:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Burns and Kevin Nessland
Defendant:
Records Custodian for Missoula County Detention Facility, Nurse LG, Nurse NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Casey Hull, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Robert J Burns
Defendant:
Casey Hull, Inc., Luke Frederick and Frederick Timber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Walter Burns v. K. Harrington
as 12-56997
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER J. BURNS
Respondent - Appellee:
K. HARRINGTON
Brandon Burns v. Leroy Kirkegard
as 12-71963
Petitioner:
BRANDON J. BURNS
Respondent:
LEROY KIRKEGARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
