Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Denham v. Aranda et al
as 3:2009cv01505
Plaintiff:
Paul Denham
Defendant:
Aranda, Benvin, Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Spence et al
as 3:2009cv01463
Plaintiff:
Darnell Dukes
Defendant:
K Spence, T Stricklin, J Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrethers v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2009cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carrethers, Kenneth Carrethers and Kenneth Carrethers
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit, J. Mehserle, F. Guanzon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bartlett et al v. Douglas K. Smith Marine Insurance Services, Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
Richard Bartlett and Marlene Bartlett
Defendant:
Douglas K. Smith Marine Insurance Services, Inc, Great Lakes Reinsurance Company and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jamie K Smith v. Guillermina Hall
as 2:2007cv05824
Petitioner:
Jamie K Smith
Respondent:
Guillermina Hall and Guillermina Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01209
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00469
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Sevilla v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
Thomas Anthony Sevilla
Defendant:
James Tilton, J. Woodforde, R - Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
