Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Mayfield v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01062
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayfield
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rackley v. Cates et al
as 2:2010cv01065
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Rackley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmona v. Grannis et al
as 2:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Luis Carmona
Defendant:
N. Grannis, R. Pimentel, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell et al v Cates et al
as 2:2010cv00719
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayfield, Terry Lefavour, Roy Fairwell and others
Defendant:
M. Cates, N. Grannis, R. Subia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn v. Cate et al
as 2:2010cv00546
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Wynn
Defendant:
M. Cate, J. Tilton, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Grannis et al
as 5:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Luis Carmona
Defendant:
N. Grannis, R. Pimentel, M. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parthemore v. Martel et al
as 2:2009cv02330
Plaintiff:
Ira Don Parthemore
Defendant:
M. Martel, Lonnie Jackson, M. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughlin v. Martel et al
as 2:2008cv02629
Plaintiff:
George T. McLaughlin
Defendant:
M. Martel, Secretary of Corrections, V. Federico and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Larry Heffez, et al v. Limelight Networks, Inc., et al
as 08-17009
:
In re: LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY HEFFEZ, MITCHELL ROBBINS, DAVID GECHLIK and others
Plaintiff:
FAISAL MUSTAFA, HENDO WEERNIK, BENJAMIN PAUL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., JEFFREY W. LUNSFORD, NATHAN F. RACIBORSKI and others
Lacy v. Hubbard, et al.
as 2:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dwight E. Lacy
Defendant:
S. Hubbard, L. Jensen, K. Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
