Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 20-55111
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 20-35062
Defendant / Appellee: C. P. SPENCE, Inspector, TERRI SMITH, MEGAN J. BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEROME JULIUS BROWN, Sr.
Romik Amirian et al v. Megan J. Brennan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00811
Plaintiff: ROMIK AMIRIAN
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service, SEBASTIAN REYES, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00666
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portillo v. Brennan
as 3:2020cv05035
Defendant: Megan J Brennan, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: Leroy Portillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00002
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Douglas, Jr. v. Megan Brennan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56518
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1-10, inclusive and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff / Appellant: VAN DOUGLAS, Jr.
Thomas Riley v. Megan Brennan
as 19-36080
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS M. RILEY
Defendant / Appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Danea Countach v. Megan Brennan
as 19-17516
Defendant / Appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANEA S. COUNTACH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10573
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?