Cases 41 - 50 of 277
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR, DULCE SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Kum Nam Lee v. Proland Management
as 2:2022cv02304
Petitioner:
Kum Nam Lee
Respondent:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cariano et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Alfred Cariano, Alfred N. English, Amar K. King and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patrick Nam v. Joyce Azria LLC
as 2:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Patrick Nam
Defendant:
Joyce Azria LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Antwone Stokes v. Kuhl et al
as 2:2021cv09517
Plaintiff:
Antwone Stokes
Defendant:
Office Kuhl, Unknown Last Name Sgt., Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 22-55065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 21-56226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Kum Lee v. Proland Management
as 21-56319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUM NAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee:
PROLAND MANAGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
