Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Siegel v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv05625
Plaintiff:
Alfred H. Siegel
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SB Liquidation Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv05458
Plaintiff:
SB Liquidation Trust
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv01939
Plaintiff:
Costco Wholesale Corp.
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv04945
Plaintiff:
Target Corp. , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Kmart Corp and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv04572
Plaintiff:
Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv03205
Plaintiff:
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
:
In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv05840
Plaintiff:
Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Motorola, Inc. and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
