Cases 41 - 50 of 2,926
The People of The State of California v. Alfred McZeal
as 8:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
The People of The State of California
Defendant:
Alfred McZeal, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Steven Aguilar v. The People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Steven Aguilar
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emert v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2023cv02318
Petitioner:
Robert Emert
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and San Diego Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huff v. People of the State of California
as 24-641
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Gonzalez v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Balam Eugenio Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Brian D. Phillips and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lonnie Lee Poslof v. People of The States of California et al
as 5:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Defendant:
People of The States of California, Jhon Pacheco, George Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The People Of The State Of California v. E-Juice Vapor, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02372
Plaintiff:
The People Of The State Of California
Defendant:
E-JUICE VAPOR, INC., FLAWLESS NEW 2020 LLC, HIND MALIK and others
Caparaz v. People of the State of California
as 5:2023cv06562
Petitioner:
Alvin V. Caparaz
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. InComm Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu
Defendant:
InComm Financial Services, Inc., TBBK Card Services, Inc., Sutton Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
