Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Hallmark v. Dickerson et al
as 3:2015cv02352
Defendant:
Jose Castilleja, Columbia County, Jeff Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
James Oman Hallmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2015cv01920
Defendant:
Wells B. Ashby, Glen D. Baisinger, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pope v. Polk County et al
as 3:2015cv01721
Defendant:
Dawn Horn, Rick Imel, Polk County and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Coursey
as 2:2013cv01612
Petitioner:
Ernest H. Baker, III
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mauer v. Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv01198
Defendant:
Howard Bowen and Rick Jackson
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jerome Mauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlotzhauer v. USA
as 1:2015cv01020
Petitioner:
Rick Roy Schlotzhauer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mays v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2015cv00898
Defendant:
Rick Benitez, Brian Bishop, Larry Blanton and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Burl Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. Angelozzi et al
as 3:2015cv00442
Defendant:
"Kirk" , R.N., "Mary" , R.N., Rick Angelozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Richard Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes et al v. The State of Oregon et al
as 1:2014cv02042
Defendant:
Robert S. Bain, Lindi Baker, Thomas A. Balmer and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D M Mayes and Michael L Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Field v. Coursey
as 2:2014cv01977
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
Petitioner:
Shawn W. Field
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
