Cases 41 - 50 of 359
CSAA Insurance Exchange v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2017cv01290
Plaintiff:
CSAA Insurance Exchange
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfaro v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 5:2017cv03588
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company
Plaintiff:
Yarita Alfaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L.A. T Shirt & Print, Inc., v. KMart Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06971
Defendant:
KMart Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co. and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. T Shirt & Print, Inc., and L.A. T Shirt and Print, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Riot Society
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Philip Meldman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mariana Lemos v. Sears, Roebuck and Co et al
as 5:2017cv00598
Defendant:
Does, Samsung, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mariana Lemos
Movant:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc.
Harvey v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Harvey
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Corning v. MTD Products Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kevin Corning
Defendant:
MTD Products, Inc and Sears, Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercury Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Mercury Casualty Company
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and Whirlpool Corporation
Sumner et al v. Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
Sumner, Gerald Sumner and Sarah Sumner
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc, CBS Corporation, Trane US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.