Cases 41 - 50 of 2,468
In re Naturalization Ceremony 2/27/2024
as 3:2024mc80035
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Sofya Abraham, Eric Yan Bao and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Romero Romero v. Garland
as 24-743
Petitioner:
NECTALI ULISES ROMERO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nazario Chavez v. Zera Financial LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Nazario Chavez
Defendant:
Zera Financial LLC and Luis A. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almidon-Miranda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-634
Petitioner:
GEORGE BRIAN ALMIDON-MIRANDA, YESENIA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA and GAHELA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
C. et al v. Town of Atherton et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
K. C. and D. B.
Defendant:
Town of Atherton, David Metzger, Diego Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shao v. Urban Alchemy et al
as 3:2023cv06300
Plaintiff:
Jenny Shao
Defendant:
Urban Alchemy, Mid-Market Foundation, Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
