Cases 51 - 60 of 6,035
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2787
Petitioner:
LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Dauwalder v. Atherton et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dauwalder
Defendant:
J. Atherton, J. Perez, Rostislav Davydov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez Hernandez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2734
Plaintiff:
JESUS ANTONIO PEREZ HERNANDEZ and JUAN CARLOS VAZQUEZ AVILA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Crystal Jillson et al v. Torrid LLC
as 2:2024cv03404
Plaintiff:
Crystal Jillson and Carmen Perez
Defendant:
Torrid LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Perez v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Arely Buendia Perez
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Richard Timmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia Perez v. Monson
as 2:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kelly Denise Garcia Perez
Defendant:
Jacquelin Elizabeth Monson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cucunubo Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2428
Petitioner:
JOSE RICARDO CUCUNUBO PEREZ, YULI ANDREA MEDINA GONZALEZ, CHRISTIAN RICHARD CUCUNUBO MEDINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
