Cases 51 - 60 of 140
Marsha Doland v. Autozone Inc, et al
as 18-55273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHA DOLAND, successor in interest to William Doland; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOZONE INC and DOES, 1-25, inclusive
Donna Walker et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv00857
Defendant:
DOES 1-50,, CARLOS MORAN,, CHARLIE BECK and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA TRESVANT, TARYN TRESVANT, Donna Walker and others
Claimant:
Eduardo The Law Offices of Eddie Luna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jimmy Ellison v. Autozone Inc
as 17-17533
:
In re: AUTOZONE, INC., WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY ELLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOZONE INC
Stuart et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Samuel Price Stuart and Anita Louise Stuart
Defendant:
ABB Inc , American Electric Power Company Inc, Autozone Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jimmy Ellison, et al v. Autozone Inc
as 16-80182
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JIMMY ELLISON and MARSHA DOLAND, as individuals, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
AUTOZONE INC
Jimmy Ellison, et al v. Autozone Inc
as 16-80182
Undetermined:
JIMMY ELLISON, MARSHA DOLAND, as individuals, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and AUTOZONE INC
Mary Ruth Hughes et al v. AutoZone Parts, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08009
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts, Inc., AutoZone, Inc., AutoZone.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ruth Hughes and Kevin Shenkman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
