Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Holmes v. Atkinson
as 2:2010cv01774
Defendant:
Larry A. Atkinson
Plaintiff:
Jesse B. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Williams v. CDCR, et al
as 10-15139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, NOLA GRANNIS, J. WALKER and others
John Williams v. CDCR, et al
as 09-16965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, NOLA GRANNIS, J. WALKER and others
Anthony Tarkington v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-16098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LYLE TARKINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, SCOTT KERNAN, J. WALKER and others
Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Nola Grannis, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Williams v. J. Flint, et al
as 09-15206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. FLINT, B. HOLMES, BLACKBURN and others
Lamon v. Director of the CDC et al
as 2:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
Director of the CDC, G Stratton, S. Kerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
George Johnson v. Sherman Joseph, et al
as 08-15626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE I. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRALESI, Seargent, FLINT, Lieutenant, CSP Sacramento, HILL, Captain and others
Valley v. Tilton, et al
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Valley
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, A. J. Malfi, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Zuber et al
as 2:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Glenn A Dunn
Defendant:
J Zuber, Scott Kernan, B Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
