Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Phyllis Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 2:2013cv01348
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams, Debra Akins, Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 3:2012cv03083
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams , Debra Akins , Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wauneta Raynor v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04615
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wauneta Raynor , Felisha Gibson , Audrey Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antwine Blackmon v. Terri Gonzalez
as 12-56511
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTWINE T. BLACKMON
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden, CMC East
Lupe Abina et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05046
Plaintiff:
Lupe Abina, Rebecca Akire, Benjamin Albanese and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Lange v. Nickerson et al
as 3:2012cv01294
Plaintiff:
Alex Lange
Defendant:
Tim Nickerson, James Blackmon, Henry Ramelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackmon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Adult Parole Operations et al
as 4:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
Valdez Blackmon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Adult Parole Operations, J. Larson, James Scaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blackmon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2012cv00961
Plaintiff:
Valdez Blackmon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Larson, James Scaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAHI SARWAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv01858
Defendant:
AYRESE, Allan, Almond and others
Plaintiff:
SAHI SARWAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
