Cases 51 - 60 of 898
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Edward Steiner v. Jon Fischer, et al
as 23-35379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. STEINER
Defendant / Appellee:
JON FISCHER, Counselor, JILL HARPER, Psych. ARNP and WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Harper v. Trumbull
as 4:2023cv02623
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Harper
Defendant:
Patricia V. Trumbull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harper v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Lisah Harper
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Aaron Shaun Harper v. M. Marquez et al
as 2:2023cv03864
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shaun Harper
Defendant:
M. Marquez, P. Flores and A. Sixt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Shaun Harper v. M. Marquez et al
as 2:2023cv03593
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shaun Harper
Defendant:
M. Marquez, P. Flores, A. Sixt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirabelli et al v. Olson et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West
Defendant:
Mark Olson, Frank Huston, Joan Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Justin Cody Harper v. City of Redlands et al
as 5:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Justin Cody Harper
Defendant:
City of Redlands, City of Redlands Police Department, Police Officer Koahau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
