Cases 51 - 60 of 325
Scott v. Herzog et al
as 3:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Sgt FNU Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. HSA-Patrick Jones, et al.
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
HSA-Patrick Jones, HSA-Jaque Dolan, Rona Siegert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Seitz v. IBT, et al
as 22-15902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SEITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 986, CHRIS GRISWOLD, Principal Officer Teamsters Local 986 and others
Donna Marie Patrick et al v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
as 8:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Patrick and James Edward Patrick
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company, Does 1 through 100 and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Clark v. Thahesha Jusino
as 22-55152
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
THAHESHA L. JUSINO, Warden
Williams v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Bowell v. Raymond Madden
as 21-71436
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BOWELL
Respondent:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
James Rose, Jr. v. State of California
as 21-56262
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, Jr., AKA Jason Elliot Roman III
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
James Cupp, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-16809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CUPP and LAWRENCE HAVEN
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, XAVIER BECERRA and ROB BONTA
Defendant:
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER W. BOYD, CHRISTIAN BAERRESEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
