Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepherd v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 3:2019cv01989
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Elisabeth Devos and U.S. Department of Education
Plaintiff:
James R. Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
McDougal v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 3:2019cv01978
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Petitioner:
Yutz McDougal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Barnett v. U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group
as 2:2019cv01542
Plaintiff:
Cory Barnett
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education Default Resolution Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Roland Ma v. USEDU, et al
as 19-35726
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MA
Armin Abazari v. U.S. Department of Education, et al
as 19-55854
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 55, STATE OF ILLINOIS, ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMIN ABAZARI, DPM, JD Candidate
Roland Ma v. University of Southern California et al
as 2:2019cv06429
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education and University of Southern California
Plaintiff:
Roland Ma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roland Ma v. USEDU, et al
as 19-35596
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MA
Andre Ali v. Scotia Group Management, LLC, et al
as 19-16285
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, C/O Education Credit Mngmt Corp, DOUG DUCEY, Governor, TUCSON CITY COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE H. ALI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
