Cases 61 - 70 of 3,289
Gwendolyn Hall v. Gwenervere Flaggs et al
as 2:2024cv03594
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Dr. Gwenervere Flaggs, Cheryl Newman Gains, L.A. Care Medi-Cal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Gwendolyn Hall v. Los Angeles Sheriff Department
as 2:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. California State Board of Pharmacy
as 24-2627
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY
Hall v. Boyle et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Kenya Hall
Defendant:
Chris Boyle, Grace Moran, Karissa Kurrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
as 24-2547
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gwendolyn Hall v. Rob Bonta
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ballester v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Ballester
Defendant:
Judge Laura H. Miller, Presiding Judge Maureen F. Hallahan, Judge CJ Mody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
