Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Margalit Corber, et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 13-56306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARGALIT CORBER, RENE CARO, STEVE DANTZLER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Caro v. The Members of Congress et al
as 3:2013cv03416
Petitioner:
Rudy Caro
Respondent:
The Members of Congress, The President of the United States and The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Caro et al
as 2:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Isidro Caro, Jorge L Molinar and Fifth Camel LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Beteta v. Cate et al
as 1:2013cv00746
Plaintiff:
Jose N. Beteta
Defendant:
Matthew Cate and Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margalit Corber, et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 13-80084
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARGALIT CORBER, RENE CARO, STEVE DANTZLER and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Ana Mendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70508
Petitioner:
ANA BERTHA MENDEZ, AKA Ana Bertha Gutierre Cervantes, AKA Veronica Cervantes Ruiz, AKA Claudia Dinhorah Lopez Caro
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ramirez-Salazar v. Marks et al
as 2:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
Luciano Ramirez-Salazar
Defendant:
Caro Marks, Richard Cohen, Timothy L. Zindel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Margalit Corber et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09986
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, AAIPharma Inc, AAIPharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wendelen Ashby, Carmen Bedford, Joanne Bierzynski and others
Bojorquez-Caro v. USA
as 3:2012cv02638
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ubaldo Bojorquez-Caro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
