Cases 61 - 70 of 98
Bowler et al v. ING Direct et al
as 3:2010cv05871
Plaintiff:
Rick R Bowler and Marilee J Thompson
Defendant:
ING Direct, ING Bank FSB, Latessa Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kevin Darnell Bryant v. Judge J. Thompson Hanks et al
as 2:2010cv03199
Defendant:
Richard Briones-Colman, Richard Briones-Colman, Judge F. Paul Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Darnell Bryant
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00711
Plaintiff:
Sythell J Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010at00291
Plaintiff:
Sythell J Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodolfo C. Anderson v. Debritz et al
as 2:2010cv02507
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo C. Anderson
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Debritz, Miss Feldman and others
Theodore Thompson v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 10-15716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE J. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director of the Nevada Department of Corrections, DR. R. BANNISTER, Medical Director of Nevada Department of Corrections, DR. MUMFORD, Chief Medical Officer and others
Ricardo Lanier v. Robert Hernandez, et al
as 09-56993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO EDWIN LANIER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden, A. L. COTA, Associate Warden, K. SPENCE, Lieutenant and others
Kevin Bryant v. California Superior Court, et al
as 09-56530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, in its individual and official capacities, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, in its individual and official capacities, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a Dummy Corporation, in its individual and official capacities and others
Thompson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00474
Petitioner:
Aaron J Thompson
Respondent:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
