Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 92
West Edna Associates, Ltd. dba Mojave Electric v. Safeco Insurance Company Of America et al
as 2:2013cv01129
Defendant: Johnson Controls, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company Of America
Plaintiff: West Edna Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Foremost Insurance Group v. Johnson Controls, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05360
Plaintiff: Foremost Insurance Group
Defendant: Johnson Controls, Inc., York International Corporation and Nova Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson Controls Inc v. Amazon Fulfillment Services Inc
as 2:2013cv00154
Plaintiff: Johnson Controls Inc
Defendant: Amazon Fulfillment Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gaither Ward v. 84 Lumber Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv10490
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, A B B Inc, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Plaintiff: Gaither Ward
Vela et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00586
Plaintiff: Eriberto O. Vela and Letitia Vela
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. , Johnson Controls, Inc. , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04215
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Moores v. Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 2:2012cv06630
Defendant: Acco Engineered Systems, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Amcord, Inc. and others
Unknown: Jamie C Ball, Edward Martinovich, Taylor C Day and others
Plaintiff: Robert Moores
James Lester David et al v. Aladdin Heating Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06052
Defendant: 3M Company, Aladdin Heating Corporation, Albay Construction Company and others
Movant: Dana Corporation
Plaintiff: James Lester David and Rebecca Lee David
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant: Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part: Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation: Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co: CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation: Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc: Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation: Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc: IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International: Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation: Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation: Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff: Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company: Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor: Zurn Industries LLC
M.S. Silva Corks, USA v. Johnson Controls et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04818
Plaintiff: M.S. Silva Corks, USA
Defendant: Johnson Controls and Johnson Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?