Cases 61 - 70 of 171
Sampson et al v. Rafferty Financial Consulting & Implementation
as 6:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Sampson and James K. Sampson
Defendant:
Rafferty Financial Consulting & Implementation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Skuletich et al
as 2:2017cv00053
Petitioner:
Bradley K. Stevens
Respondent:
George Skuletich and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Albert v. Abbott et al
as 6:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert
Defendant:
Heidi Abbott, Melissa Scharf, Ally Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmaus Family Properties, LLC et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 6:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Schmaus Family Properties, LLC and Joseph H. Schmaus
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management, Michael Nedd, Jon K. Raby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
H Bar N, Inc. v. WRT II, Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
H Bar N, Inc.
Defendant:
WRT II, Inc., Milferd K. Siefke , Ann M. Siefke and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Arnold et al v. Irongate Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Craig Arnold , Paul Grudek , Hank Schmidt and others
Defendant:
Irongate Services, LLC, Phillip Morris USA, Inc. , Crazy Mountain Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Nelson et al
as 4:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Londa K Nelson and Blaine County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Orcutt v. State of Montana
as 1:2016cv00155
Petitioner:
Tracy K Orcutt
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kessler v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Sheila K. Kessler
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reimer v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2016cv00091
Petitioner:
Chad K. Reimer
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
