Cases 61 - 70 of 6,820
Johnson v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05248
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Kelly Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelly, Kelly's Management MS, Inc. and Southwest Concessions, Inc.
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Packwood, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 24-1760
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR PACKWOOD and ANDREA WOOD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE CONTRA COSTA SHERIFF and others
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024at00358
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kelly v. Hixon
as 3:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Lamar Kelly
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Hixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guerra-Mosquera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1652
Petitioner:
JOHAN FERNANDO GUERRA-MOSQUERA, KELLY MARITZA PARRA-CORTES, LAURA SOFIA OSSA-PARRA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pitpit v. Teamsters Local 150 et al
as 2:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kelli Pitpit
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 150 and Dale Wentz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Kelly Ann Willard v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Willard
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
