Cases 61 - 70 of 180
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-15616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
King v. Indy Mac Bank FSB et al
as 2:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Kevin King
Defendant:
Indy Mac Bank FSB, Pacific Reverse Mortgage, Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Williams v. Howell et al
as 2:2018cv00537
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Howell
Petitioner:
Dresden Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Love v. Michael William Carey et al
as 5:2018cv00567
Defendant:
Michael William Carey and Does
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Michael Magidson v. Kathleen Allison
as 18-15012
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM MAGIDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden
USA v. Robert Saunders
as 17-10526
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT ST. AUBYN SAUNDERS, AKA Milton Crooms, AKA Robert S. Saunders, AKA Robert St. Aubya Saunders, AKA Michael Williams
Williams v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00647
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00595
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05659
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
