Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Mountain Pacific Machinery, Inc. v. Davis
as 3:2013cv02149
Defendant:
Parker Davis
Plaintiff:
Mountain Pacific Machinery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Mountain Pacific Machinery, INc. v. Davis
as 0:2013cv02149
Defendant:
Parker Davis
Plaintiff:
Mountain Pacific Machinery, INc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Young et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2013cv02039
Defendant:
All Other BHU Specislist/Counselors, All Stock Holders, c/o Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Bartol, Matthew J. Cross, Robert Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Parker et al
as 3:2013cv01772
Defendant:
MD Stephanie Anderson, Does 1 to 100, LMG Northeast and others
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard v. Real et al
as 6:2013cv01438
Defendant:
Al Hannon, Greg Jones, Jamie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
Parker Michael Knight
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Knight v. Portland State University
as 3:2013cv01416
Plaintiff:
Parker Michael Knight
Defendant:
Portland State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01346
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
