Cases 61 - 70 of 49,568
Grant v. Multnomah County Jail
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaVaughn Grant
Defendant:
Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Align Technology, Inc. v. Dischinger Orthodontics, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Align Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Dischinger Orthodontics, P.C. and William Dischinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Duffy v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Duffy
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Eisele v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Eisele
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Eckles et al
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Defendant:
nathaniel cyrus eckles, STEPHANIE KELLAMS, MELEESA JOY YESASHIMWE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182 Immigration & Nationality Act of 1990
Taylor v. Immergut
as 2:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Karin J. Immergut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitman v. LifeMap Assurance Company
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
Nell Whitman
Defendant:
LifeMap Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Kotek et al
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Chad Johnson
Defendant:
Tina Kotek and Kris Strickler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
