Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Center For Biological Diversity v. Debra Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06996
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and Douglas Boren
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35701
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Mark Higgins, et al v. Mark Higgins, et al
as 22-16470
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK ROCK HIGGINS, beneficiary private irish moor aboriginal Arizonian national, subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and HIGGINS FAMILY TRUST, a private express trust trustee of Mark Rock Higgins
Defendant / Appellee: MARK ROCK HIGGINS, Mark Rock Higgins Estate, SEAN RICK HIGGINS, Sean Rick Higgins Estate, TYLER ROCK HIGGINS, Tyron Rock Higgins Estate and others
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant: Deb Haaland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Sierra Club et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2022cv00189
Plaintiff: Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace, Inc.
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
The State of Alaska et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: The State of Alaska and The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35549
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY and others
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, DONATO JUDICE, in his official capacity as Montana Bureau of Land Management State Director, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Petitioner: CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC and CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., Proposed Intervenor-Defendants

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?