Cases 71 - 80 of 168
Davenport v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 3:2016cv05447
Plaintiff:
Clyde R. Davenport
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase , All Persons Known and/or Unknown Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title Estate, Lien Or Interest In The Property Described In the Petition Adverse To Plaintiff's Title Or Any Cloud On Plain and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts, et al. v. City of Chula Vista
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts , Timothy Abrams , David Albright and others
Defendant:
Chula Vista, City of and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Davenport v. Gomez et al.
as 2:2016cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Gomez, E. Hernandez, M. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davenport v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2016cv01807
Plaintiff:
James Davenport
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2016md02691
Defendant:
Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrews, Amador Herrara, Lyle Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davenport et al v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA
as 3:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Clyde R. Davenport and Ellen L. Davenport
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, FA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport v. Sacramento County Child Protective Services
as 2:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ruben-Jacob Davenport
Defendant:
Sacramento County Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scannell v. Davenport
as 3:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scannell
Defendant:
Alberta Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robert Lee Davenport v. Phan et al
as 2:2016cv01284
Defendant:
A. Chen, A. Chen, Correctional Officer Evangelista and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Davenport
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
