Cases 71 - 80 of 9,043
Warren v. Sparks Police Department, et al.
as 24-2308
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
SPARKS POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JONES and others
Blanche Phlaum et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Blanche Phlaum and Jason Jones
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union, DOES 1-100, and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Morgan, et al.
as 24-2271
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JONES
Defendant:
DARYL MORGAN, JOHN HOFFMAN and MATTHEW GILLIS
Turner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2237
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., SCOTT KERNAN, MATTHEW CATES and others
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant:
AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Ravon Jones v. Charles Schuyler
as 2:2024cv02916
Petitioner:
Ravon Jones
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Robert D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edjuan Jones v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02858
Plaintiff:
Edjuan Jones
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA LLC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Buchanan v. Wilson Jones Commissioning LLC
as 2:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Buchanan and Andrew C Buchanan
Defendant:
Wilson Jones Commissioning LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mark James Lyon v. Gena Jones
as 2:2024cv02812
Petitioner:
Mark James Lyon
Respondent:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
