Cases 71 - 80 of 3,175
Williams v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-769
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RACHEL MITCHELL, Maricopa County Attorney, AUBREY ACKERMAN, Deputy County Attorney, JASON TYLER GRONSKI, Public Defender and others
Williams v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-772
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HUNTLEY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, JUSTIN BERESKY, Judge and NICHOLAS RADOFF, Prosecutor
Bonilla v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and Jacquelyn Lovrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. White
as 4:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Jeffrey S. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sammartino
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Judge Janis L. Sammartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. U.S. District Court et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
U.S. District Court, Judges/Clerks Office Deputy and Janis L. Sammartino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard-Ex. v. Las Vegas Township Justice Court et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Defendant:
Las Vegas Township Justice Court, Las Vegas Justice Court and Judge Jessica Goodey
Plaintiff:
Mr. Clayton-M. Bernard-Ex
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Petrozzi v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROBERT PETROZZI
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, RONALD LEIGHTON, JAMES FLYNN and others
Caraffa v. Unknown Leon, et al.
as 24-681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN LEON, c/o mail/property officer at Rincon, UNKNOWN RAMOS, housing unit 5 correctional officer, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as unknown unlawful employees of ASPC- Tucson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
