Cases 71 - 80 of 326
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McGovern v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 3:2018cv01794
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Reyna McGovern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv05367
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
O'Connor v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., et al.,
as 3:2018cv04198
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., U.S. Bank N.A., Select Portfolio Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Castillo et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01591
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., First American Title Insurance Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nanet Castillo and Glenn Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv04197
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., U.S. BANK, N.A., successor Trustee to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor to LASALLE BANK, N.A., as Trustee, on behalf of the holders of WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR14 and Select Portfolio Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
