Cases 71 - 79 of 79
David Nguyen v. MERS et al
as 8:2011cv00361
Defendant:
Any Unknown Defendant, Auroa Loan Services LLC, Does and others
Plaintiff:
David Nguyen
Rodrick C Reed v Ty Labbe et al
as 2:2010cv08315
Defendant:
Dennis J Barpon, Dennis J Barpon, Jeffery S Boset and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick C Reed
Juan Ortega v. City of Inglewood et al
as 2:2010cv04166
Defendant:
City of Inglewood, Officer Oswaldo Figueroa, Officer Alvaro Ruiz and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ortega
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews v. John Nepomuceno et al
as 2:2010cv03425
Defendant:
Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. Lettie Burgett, Dr. John Nepomuceno and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Espinoza-Matthews
Rodrick Reed v. Ty Labbe et al
as 2:2010cv02000
Defendant:
Dennis J. Barron, Dennis J. Barron, Jeffrey S. Boset and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Reed
Elvir Mark Villanueva v. Diamond Restaurant Management et al
as 5:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
Elvir Mark Villanueva
Defendant:
Diamond Restaurant Management, Burger King Organization, FCRM Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Erfelina Bonilla Reyes et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv02225
Plaintiff:
Erfelina Bonilla Reyes, Erfelina Bonilla Reyes, Erfelina Bonilla Reyes and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Gray J. Bratton, Cayler Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tesha Taylor-Ewing v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2007cv05556
Plaintiff:
Tesha Taylor-Ewing and Tesha Taylor-Ewing
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Doe Castaneda, 50 Unknown Named Employees of the City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armando Chavez et al v. Harry Hatch et al
as 5:2007cv00344
Plaintiff:
Armando Chavez, Armando Chavez, Oscar Chavez and others
Defendant:
Harry Hatch, Harry Hatch, Harry Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
