Cases 81 - 90 of 131
Neal v. State of Alaska
as 3:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Neal
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtice v. F/V Steven-Daniel et al
as 3:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Pamela Curtice
Defendant:
F/V Steven-Daniel and Steve Ally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Chase v. State of Alaska, Office of Children Services et al
as 4:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Chase
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Office of Children Services, Rosalee Rein, Jayleen Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byford v. Chenault et al
as 3:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Byford, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Michael Chenault, Sharalyn Sue Wright, Carl Edward Kock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Menish v. F/V ARCTIC FOX, Official No. 1187928 et al
as 3:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Bill Menish
Defendant:
F/V ARCTIC FOX, Official No. 1187928 and Daniel J. Crome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Stephens et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Leah Stephens and Danielle Rehm
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. M/Y SEATEX, O.N. 287804 et al
as 3:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Baker , L. Sue Baker and Seatex Charters, Inc.
Defendant:
M/Y SEATEX, O.N. 287804, Daniel Jeffery Webb and Seatex Charters II LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Lewis v. Turnbull
as 3:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carson Lewis
Defendant:
Craig Turnbull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Daniel W. Woodruff and Ruby K. Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nasunin v. United States of America, Dep't of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 3:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patta Nasunin
Defendant:
United States of America, Dep't of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
