Cases 81 - 90 of 873
Paul Puri
as 21-80083
Respondent:
In re: PAUL N. PURI, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar on June 24, 2003
O. L. v. Liliana Jara, et al
as 21-55740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L.
Defendant / Appellee:
LILIANA JARA, RICHARD RUIZ, CITY OF EL MONTE and others
Ji et al v. Naver Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv05143
Defendant:
LINE Euro-Americas Corporation, LINE Plus Corporation, Naver Cloud Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Bonner, Kira Tomlinson, Sydney Ji and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biba Restaurant, Inc. v. Chang et al
as 2:2021at00589
Defendant:
Karel Mulac, Penny Sheridan, June Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Biba Restaurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Biba Restaurant, Inc. v. Chang et al
as 2:2021cv01150
Defendant:
Karel Mulac, Penny Sheridan, June Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Biba Restaurant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dillon Bruno et al v. CRSBX et al
as 2:2021cv04256
Defendant:
The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", CRSBX, June Life Store and others
Plaintiff:
Dillon Bruno, CALIBER8 INC., a California Corporation and Caliber8 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Manfredi et al v. Saujani
as 1:2021cv00244
Plaintiff:
June Manfredi, Chris Manfredi and Ka'u Local Products LLC
Defendant:
Viren Saujani, John Does 1-50, Jane Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Eric Vandermey
as 21-80057
Respondent:
In re: ERIC WILLIAM VANDERMEY, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar, June 15, 2004
Alexander LubarskyIn re: Alexander Lubarsky
as 21-80043
Respondent:
In re: ALEXANDER H. LUBARSKY, Esquire, Admitted to the Ninth Circuit Bar, June 18, 1996
Linda June Larsen v. Bowlero Corporation
as 2:2021cv03531
Plaintiff:
Linda June Larsen
Petitioner:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Defendant:
Bowlero Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
