Cases 81 - 90 of 217
Smith v. Lewis
as 3:2017cv01017
Defendant:
Robert A. Lewis
Unknown:
Taylor R. Hallvik
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Defendant:
Bridgette Amsberry, Superintendent Rick Angelozzi, Brian Belleque and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Lewis, Tiffanie Lewis and Derrick Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Toezpecunia Inc.
as 6:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lewis
Defendant:
Toezpecunia Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schoenborn v. Deschutes County Health Services Department et al
as 6:2017cv00493
Defendant:
Deschutes County Health Services Department, Rebecca Elger, Lori Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Schoenborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nathan v. Matta et al
as 3:2016cv02127
Defendant:
Matta, Ronald J. Korn, Melvin Wesley III and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan, Andrew B Nathan and Ira S. Nathan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Lewis v. Bearden et al
as 3:2016cv02033
Respondent:
Judge Bearden, Board of Parole, Jamiel Brown and others
Petitioner:
James Ramon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Porter, et al
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Peterson
Defendant:
William Bryan Porter, Ronald Lewis Teed and Tillamook County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McCabe v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01775
Defendant:
C. Casper, J. Cook, S. Cost-Streety and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2016cv01267
Petitioner:
Timothy Roger Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Beraldo v. USA
as 3:2016cv01092
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lewis Beraldo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
