Cases 81 - 90 of 9,648
Lopez v. Marten Transport, Ltd.
as 5:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Enrique Lopez
Defendant:
Marten Transport, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Crosby et al v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Lavanz Crosby and Andreanai Hall
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Lopez v. Luhan et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lopez
Defendant:
Luhan, Chavez, Pohovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lopez v. Luhan et al
as 2:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lopez
Defendant:
Luhan, Chavez, Pohovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Cortez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2889
Petitioner:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
S. SALMONSON, WARDEN
Garcia-Avila, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2898
Petitioner:
MELVIN ALEXI GARCIA-AVILA, EDITHA DANIELA RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ANGELINE DARIANA GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Cruz-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2797
Petitioner:
YEIMY ROSVENY CRUZ-LOPEZ and VALERY BONILLA-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2787
Petitioner:
LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
