Cases 1 - 10 of 482
Enriquez v. Garland
as 24-3381
Petitioner:
PEDRO QUINTERO ENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bentley v. Inzunza et al
as 3:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Bentley
Defendant:
Marisol Inzunza, A. Enriquez and O. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Washington et al v. Fern et al
as 2:2024cv03723
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Jackie Lacey, Jose I. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
US Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv02822
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Frank Enriquez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02184
Petitioner:
Frank Enriquez and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Enriquez v. Garland
as 24-1547
Petitioner:
FREDDY ANTONIO ENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
