Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
National Abortion Federation (NAF) v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 24-1948
Defendant:
DAVID DALEIDEN, also known as Robert Daoud Sarkis, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION (NAF)
Bender v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Amy Bender
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, David Ewell, Robert Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooley v. Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Frederick Marc Cooley
Defendant:
Menzies Aviation (USA) Inc., Amer SM Asif, William Revis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, official capacity, MARK A. YOUNG, individual capacity, LISA SEPE-WIENFELD, individual capacity and others
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LISA K. SEPE-WESENFELD, Judge and BOBBI TILLMON
Cooley v. City of Inglewood
as 24-405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF INGLEWOOD, official capacity
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
