Cases 1 - 10 of 5,122
Vila v. Simon Miller Inc.
as 2:2024cv07928
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vila
Defendant:
Simon Miller Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Langenderfer v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv06526
Defendant:
Roger A. Miller, Nicholos Lumbreras and Thomas J. Madden
Plaintiff:
Thomas Langenderfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01654
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Amir Fatemi v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv07797
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Miller-DM, Inc. dba Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatemi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Terry D. Banks, Jr. v. County of Riverside
as 5:2024cv01914
Defendant:
Gary L. Adams, Steven Heavrin, Victoria Weiss and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Banks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marner et al v. U.S. Department of the Air Force et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Defendant:
U.S. Space Force, U.S. Department of the Air Force and U.S. Air Force
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Miller, Zachary Marner, Taryn White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Burch v. Miller
as 2:2024cv07463
Plaintiff:
Emerald Burch
Defendant:
Troy A Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emerald Burch v. Troy A. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv07468
Defendant:
Troy A Miller
Plaintiff:
Emerald Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
