Cases 1 - 10 of 458
(SS) Acevedo Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Baldemar Acevedo Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Andrew Thompson et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMPSON and HEATHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ANDREA ACEVEDO and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Arthur Acevedo v. Punch Press Products, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02690
Plaintiff:
Arthur Acevedo
Defendant:
Punch Press Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Juarez v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Javier Acevedo Juarez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Andrew James Martinez v. Classic LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Martinez
Defendant:
Classic LLC and Sandra Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Waller v. City of Nogales, et al.
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
CORA J. WALLER, on her own behalf and as a personal representative of the estate of Glen Ray Cockrum, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF NOGALES, ROY BERMUDEZ, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ and others
Molina De Acevedo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
KARLA MELISSA MOLINA DE ACEVEDO, MAILYN ALONDRA ACEVEDO-MOLINA and ADONYS GILBERTO ACEVED-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Olivares-Acevedo v. Garland
as 24-1021
Petitioner:
ANGEL OMAR OLIVARES-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
