Cases 1 - 10 of 2,707
Gonzales v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Echo Regina Gonzales
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Fairchild v. McDonald et al
as 3:2024cv03362
Plaintiff:
Alison Helen Fairchild
Defendant:
Andrew McDonald, Julian Carlo Recana, Cheryl Lynn Kaylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Rose Hills Company et al
as 2:2024cv04632
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzales
Defendant:
Rose Hills Company, Dignity Memorial, Service Corporation International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
(PC) Ramsom v. Lucy et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Donshea Lavon Ramsom
Defendant:
Lucy, Phipps and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Ramsom v. Lucy et al
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Donshea Lavon Ramsom
Defendant:
Lucy, Phipps and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Corine Carrasco Gonzales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(PC) Diaz v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jesus Diaz
Defendant:
E. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Miguel De Oliveira v. CDCR-California Institution for Women et al
as 5:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miquel De Oliveira
Defendant:
CDCR-California Institution for Women, L. Parker, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. LENNOX INDUSTRIES INC.
as 5:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Gonzales
Defendant:
LENNOX INDUSTRIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
