Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tront v. Lowe's HIW, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2016cv00259
Defendant:
Lowe's HIW, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Lowe's Home Improvement #1537 and others
Cross Claimant:
Lowe's Home Improvement #1537
Cross Defendant:
Stanley Access Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff:
Margaret Tront
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Nielson v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Janice Nielson
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation , Stanley Black & Decker Incorporated , Stanley Access Technologies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Long et al v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01246
Plaintiff:
Donovan Long , David Horn and Lloyd Conard
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. , Stanley Access, Inc. , Stanley Security Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kristina Citro v. T.J. Maxx et al
as 8:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
Kristina Citro
Defendant:
Stanley Access Technologies and T.J. Maxx
Cahill v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv01500
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cahill
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Air Force, Travis Air Force Base and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geraldine Collins v. Target Stores et al
as 2:2010cv09130
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Collins
Defendant:
Dayton Hudson Corporation, Does, Stanley Access Technologies and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everest Indemnity Insurance Company v. Aventine-Tramoni Homeowners Association, et al.,
as 2:2009cv01672
Plaintiff:
Everest Indemnity Insurance Company and Everest Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aventine-Tramonti Homeowners Association, DOE HOMEOWNERS 1 through 500, TOWN CENTER VENTURES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
